And this is where it typically falls back on the contractor to essentially
classify an occupancy based on a DD set of drawings.
There are times when I've seen shoe storage and displays classified
correctly on an FP set. One major sports retail store that  rhymes with
licks did an impressive job.
If I were to offer my opinion, retail shelving (open rack, and bin box /
shelves should probably be limited to 8'0" in height to classify as Ord
II.  Once you exceed the average person's ability to remove or pick a
commodity, you've entered the dreaded storage chapters.

Jamie Seidl

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 1:48 PM Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Here's a discussion topic:   Today's Retail Environment
>
> As "stores" morph into "boxes", we are seeing more and more "industrial"
> displays, with unadorned shelving and in some cases rack fixtures (I'm
> thinking PetSmart among others) where merchandise is displayed for sale
> within reach of customers on the floor, but also where backstock is kept
> above those levels, sometimes driving up the interpreted "height of
> storage" to the point where the question arises as to whether this is still
> OH2 mercantile use or if we've pushed into Chapters 14-17.    PetSmart uses
> racking, Bed Bath & Beyond is one of many who use wide gondolas, Party City
> is just a box full o' plastic...  there are seemingly endless permutations
> of "retail" and of course we now have §20.3 as an option where it applies.
> But what about stores on the lower end of the occupancy hazard class where
> it may or may not be so cut and dried?  Discount shoe stores, loaded with
> synthetics for sure, but if they display shoes in boxes on shelves to 8'-0"
> or 10'-0" in only part of the store, does this retail store (that doesn't
> have a stockroom and keeps all its merch on the sales floor) really
> represent a "storage" use?
>
> What triggers the post is a Burlington store in SoCal where the fire
> authority has requested a technical report to justify keeping an older OH 2
> or 3 system in place in lieu of upgrading to protect "storage of plastics
> to 8'-0" AFF".   There are just a few shelving fixtures in this 40,000+ sq.
> ft. store that hold merch up to that level and not all of it will be
> synthetics.   It begs the question:  When does retail display become
> storage when it's not exclusively representative of the use?  Does a row of
> comforters at 7'-0" in the bedding section require specific address?   Or
> the closeout wall in the shoe department?   It's much easier when the
> entire store is typically fixturized (back to PetSmart) to say, "storage"
> but what if it's mostly on floor and low fixtures?   For new builds it's
> easier because we can use EC-25 options, higher densities, whatever but the
> impact to existing stores is potentially significant and intrusive.  I'm
> not saying we should look the other way because of concerns over cost or
> convenience but these are often last-minute catches on inspection and
> schedules can get vaporized in an instant.
>
> I've proposed a double-density approach in the past for uses like
> self-storage and §20.3 suggests that's a sound approach, but what in retail
> stores that may only have a handful of locations where this is even an
> issue?   I'm curious as to whether there are regional best practices that
> have been undertaken or whether there's been any additional work done by
> consultants or industry to help establish a lucid benchmark for when a
> "store" crosses the line with regard to occupancy hazard class.
>
>
> Steve Leyton, President
> Protection Design and Consulting
> T  |  619.255.8964 x 102  |  www.protectiondesign.com<
> http://www.protectiondesign.com/>
> 2851 Camino Del Rio South  |  Suite 210  |  San Diego, CA  92108
> Fire Protection System Design | Consulting | Planning | Training
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to