What is the battery chemistry?


Matt Grise
Alliance Fire Protection
m 913 526 7443
o 913 888 0647
f 913 888 0618

Sent from mobile device


-------- Original message --------
From: Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum <[email protected]>
Date: 1/14/21 12:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: "Prahl, Craig/GVL" <[email protected]>, 
[email protected]
Cc: Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Stand-Alone UPS protection design

I can't tell you the exact dimensions for specifications because it's in 
pre-design.   It's right next to the building, but several hundred feet from 
the existing preaction areas and riser.

-----Original Message-----
From: Prahl, Craig/GVL [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Stand-Alone UPS protection design

Steve,

Can you provide a better description of this unit?  How far from the building 
will it be located?

Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | 
[email protected] | www.jacobs.com<http://www.jacobs.com>
1041 East Butler Road   Greenville, South Carolina  29606
CONTACT BY: email or MS TEAMS

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 12:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Stand-Alone UPS protection design

I'm engaged in a conversation with a project team where an Uninterrupted Power 
Supply is being added to a local small-scale broadcast facility (NPR 
affiliate).   The control rooms and studios are already protected by preaction 
and this battery stack is being added outside the building and a ways away from 
the existing preaction areas.   The two candidate designs are to extend the 
preaction or use a pre-engineered wet-chem system and I'd love for any and 
everyone who has experience with this type of hazard to chime in on whether 
there is a preferred or "best" practice.   My feeling is that a wet-chem system 
is the way to go and the most common practice - can anyone verify or do I have 
that wrong.

Fire away please...

Steve L.


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2furldefense.com%2fv3%2f__http%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__%3b%21%21B5cixuoO7ltTeg%21RBqeKKjG60wNEVmjtlo8VtJ_60JAV9CUPjj0pGiQ2Zgf2T3xTnT90OKuOqUcJqL9Og%24&c=E,1,BShkYLUD1RLgiLgDZGfVDk05i6BwISef9l7ExjaBxbFy7ewEqpj8ib6K71px8n-sK6S7gUdeT6GDk8c14yvp5IoHcjSWkVv9opvRudfz_gA,&typo=1

________________________________

NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information 
that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or 
distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,1rqBO1RPcsDBQA_1RsOtIDA7HU6n8bYXLlak9kAhj6-rYZ6SR1DJhaMaJIcjiMN_90Zer0oMKr5S7rwTWXfdqEEzeg7GgEUMA-uY0WvKVUPOs8w8&typo=1
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to