I'm engaged in a conversation with a project team where an Uninterrupted Power Supply is being added to a local small-scale broadcast facility (NPR affiliate). The control rooms and studios are already protected by preaction and this battery stack is being added outside the building and a ways away from the existing preaction areas. The two candidate designs are to extend the preaction or use a pre-engineered wet-chem system and I'd love for any and everyone who has experience with this type of hazard to chime in on whether there is a preferred or "best" practice. My feeling is that a wet-chem system is the way to go and the most common practice - can anyone verify or do I have that wrong.
Fire away please... Steve L. _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
