Hi Alvaro, WG, Yes, support WG adoption of the draft.
Thanks, Rakesh On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 11:47 AM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: > Resending, given that last week was a holiday in the US, and some may have > missed this message. > > > On November 25, 2025 at 5:13:54 PM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker ( > [email protected]) wrote: > > > Subject: Call for adoption: draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility-04 > (Ends 2025-12-16) > > This message starts a 3-week Call for Adoption for this document. > > Abstract: > Segment Routing (SR) introduces new challenges for pinning candidate > paths on their intended paths (the path the PCE computed based on > provided intent and may have made bandwidth reservations on). The > actual path through a network can change or no longer meet the > required constraints if a SID list of an SR Policy candidate path is > not fully expressed as a list of adjacency SIDs or when a change in > the topology does happen. The introduction of the new candidate path > eligibility concept permits a path to be signaled and established as > operationally up, but controls whether the path is eligible to carry > traffic, thus influencing its active state. > The eligibility concept allows a system (operator, pce, headend, > etc.) to set eligibility as false when path deviations may have > occurred, or path constraints are no longer met for one or more SID > lists of a candidate path and clear it when candidate path deviations > are removed or constraints are met again. > > File can be retrieved from: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility/ > > Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by > indicating > whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document. > Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the > provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
