Hi SPRING chairs, Yes. I support adoption of this draft.
Reza From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 at 5:14 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [spring] Call for adoption: draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility-04 (Ends 2025-12-16) Subject: Call for adoption: draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility-04 (Ends 2025-12-16) This message starts a 3-week Call for Adoption for this document. Abstract: Segment Routing (SR) introduces new challenges for pinning candidate paths on their intended paths (the path the PCE computed based on provided intent and may have made bandwidth reservations on). The actual path through a network can change or no longer meet the required constraints if a SID list of an SR Policy candidate path is not fully expressed as a list of adjacency SIDs or when a change in the topology does happen. The introduction of the new candidate path eligibility concept permits a path to be signaled and established as operationally up, but controls whether the path is eligible to carry traffic, thus influencing its active state. The eligibility concept allows a system (operator, pce, headend, etc.) to set eligibility as false when path deviations may have occurred, or path constraints are no longer met for one or more SID lists of a candidate path and clear it when candidate path deviations are removed or constraints are met again. File can be retrieved from: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility/__;!!OSsGDw!M1zzEIPdE5jbugVqskliZ1J2uu5GBPTR5WO5ZuajpNMigEhQLIzcfcLyyJTHKMW0UOw8fmlx70M$ [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org] Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by indicating whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document. Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/__;!!OSsGDw!M1zzEIPdE5jbugVqskliZ1J2uu5GBPTR5WO5ZuajpNMigEhQLIzcfcLyyJTHKMW0UOw8qRVXwuA$ [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org] [2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/__;!!OSsGDw!M1zzEIPdE5jbugVqskliZ1J2uu5GBPTR5WO5ZuajpNMigEhQLIzcfcLyyJTHKMW0UOw8LQmXQgw$ [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org] [3] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/__;!!OSsGDw!M1zzEIPdE5jbugVqskliZ1J2uu5GBPTR5WO5ZuajpNMigEhQLIzcfcLyyJTHKMW0UOw8bjsjepg$ [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org] _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
