Thanks, Ketan. Our Initial interest is End.DTM sid to start with.
Juniper Business Use Only From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 1:57 PM To: Rajesh M <mraj...@juniper.net> Cc: swaag...@cisco.com; cfils...@cisco.com; daniel.vo...@bell.ca; gdawra.i...@gmail.com; lizhen...@huawei.com; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-00 - SRv6 and MPLS interworking [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Rajesh, The allocation request is generally made at the point where the spec is mostly ready and there is implementation interest. I believe the first one is true, so we should ask the authors to request if there is implementation interest. You will note that End.DTM has been allocated. For CSID-NEXT (uSID as you say), there is no need for a separate behavior since this is a terminal behavior that just works. Thanks, Ketan On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:12 PM Rajesh M <mraj...@juniper.net<mailto:mraj...@juniper.net>> wrote: Got it , after going through this draft https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!E9epTTCOfliDQDoYtoV24Q3YpAHglvdIz1oWFLHpldpuchWqOE-1cOMk0dT4xfuhr7jQA1sccWixmtyQ2oEA$> . Thanks, Ketan. When these values will be defined ? How about Value for micro sids for DTM/DPM sids ? +-------------+--------+-------------------------+------------------+ | TBD | TBD | End.DPM | <this document> | +-------------+--------+-------------------------+------------------+ Thanks Rajesh Juniper Business Use Only From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com>> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2024 8:28 PM To: Rajesh M <mraj...@juniper.net<mailto:mraj...@juniper.net>> Cc: swaag...@cisco.com<mailto:swaag...@cisco.com>; cfils...@cisco.com<mailto:cfils...@cisco.com>; daniel.vo...@bell.ca<mailto:daniel.vo...@bell.ca>; gdawra.i...@gmail.com<mailto:gdawra.i...@gmail.com>; lizhen...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net<mailto:shrad...@juniper.net>>; spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-00 - SRv6 and MPLS interworking [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Rajesh, I believe the answer is no - please refer to https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html#section-2.2.2<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html*section-2.2.2__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FudcnVEy4lpDoeZ-SaMOjAbWxzl44clzllc4LnMcD_hdIxLdtu_ZS3Sof8huo9pV8EEBOH92qY-5z-xwle8w$> AFAIK there is no transposition scheme specified for SAFI 4 (BGP LU). Thanks, Ketan On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 2:29 PM Rajesh M <mrajesh=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Hi All, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-00 - SRv6 and MPLS interworking<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking/00/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FudcnVEy4lpDoeZ-SaMOjAbWxzl44clzllc4LnMcD_hdIxLdtu_ZS3Sof8huo9pV8EEBOH92qY-5z6ZaoEeE$> section 7.1.2.2.2. Label and SRv6 SID translation per BGP LU route We can do transposition here for DPM sid or not (while advertising )? Thanks Rajesh Juniper Business Use Only _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
