Hi Rajesh, The allocation request is generally made at the point where the spec is mostly ready and there is implementation interest. I believe the first one is true, so we should ask the authors to request if there is implementation interest. You will note that End.DTM has been allocated.
For CSID-NEXT (uSID as you say), there is no need for a separate behavior since this is a terminal behavior that just works. Thanks, Ketan On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:12 PM Rajesh M <mraj...@juniper.net> wrote: > Got it , after going through this draft > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html > . > > Thanks, Ketan. > > > > > > When these values will be defined ? How about Value for micro sids for > DTM/DPM sids ? > > +-------------+--------+-------------------------+------------------+ > > | TBD | TBD | End.DPM | <this document> | > > +-------------+--------+-------------------------+------------------+ > > > > Thanks > > Rajesh > > > > > > > > Juniper Business Use Only > > *From:* Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, November 25, 2024 8:28 PM > *To:* Rajesh M <mraj...@juniper.net> > *Cc:* swaag...@cisco.com; cfils...@cisco.com; daniel.vo...@bell.ca; > gdawra.i...@gmail.com; lizhen...@huawei.com; Shraddha Hegde < > shrad...@juniper.net>; spring@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-00 - > SRv6 and MPLS interworking > > > > *[External Email. Be cautious of content]* > > > > Hi Rajesh, > > > > I believe the answer is no - please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html#section-2.2.2 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-agrawal-bess-bgp-srv6-mpls-interworking-01.html*section-2.2.2__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FudcnVEy4lpDoeZ-SaMOjAbWxzl44clzllc4LnMcD_hdIxLdtu_ZS3Sof8huo9pV8EEBOH92qY-5z-xwle8w$> > > > > AFAIK there is no transposition scheme specified for SAFI 4 (BGP LU). > > > > Thanks, > > Ketan > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 2:29 PM Rajesh M <mrajesh= > 40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-00 - SRv6 and MPLS interworking > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking/00/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FudcnVEy4lpDoeZ-SaMOjAbWxzl44clzllc4LnMcD_hdIxLdtu_ZS3Sof8huo9pV8EEBOH92qY-5z6ZaoEeE$> > > > > section 7.1.2.2.2. Label and SRv6 SID translation per BGP LU route > > > > We can do transposition here for DPM sid or not (while advertising )? > > > > Thanks > > Rajesh > > > > > > Juniper Business Use Only > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
