Hi Andrew

Much appreciate your comments!

Inline

Regards
Hooman

From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) <andrew.stone=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 5:13 PM
To: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org>; Michael 
McBride <michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com>; p...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

Hi PIM,

I've reviewed the latest version and support its progression. The document is a 
fairly straight forward read extending on the existing P2MP architecture 
documents and leverages the existing p2mp mpls ping capabilities in an SR way 
in a clean way.

Authors, some minor text comments/suggestions below.

Thanks
Andrew



Section 3 - it says the ping/traceroute can be initiated from the node that 
initiates the P2MP Policy. Would it more clear to just say "From the root of 
the P2MP Policy"?
HB> I am not sure if the P2MP policy is always the root, in the case of Nokia 
implementation a P2MP policy is the root, you are correct, but I know other 
vendors can stitch a unicast policy from a root to a P2MP policy on a transit 
router. As an example even the candidate path on the router that is initiating 
the P2MP policy can have a incoming SID for its replication segment . In this 
case the ping or traceroute should work from the P2MP policy segment onward.
Section 3.1 - /packet are/packets are/
HB> thank you will change this.
Section 3.1 /appropriate respond is send/appropriate response is sent/
HB> thank you will correct this.
Section 3.1 "trace route" and others have "Traceroute" - suggest one or the 
other
HB> thanks!
Section 3.1 - " On the egress node the corresponding CP and its PI should 
respond irrespective if it is the active CP or a backup CP."

Seems this statement iis intermixing a few terms that can be misinterpreted 
depending on the perspective due to the CP, backup CP, and PI active terms. The 
term "egress" was throwing me off a bit as well. My understanding is the 
purpose of the text is to indicate the following:

- Every transit and leaf node along the path which has a path instance, those 
instances are installed, and SHOULD process and respond to ping/traceroute even 
if that path instance is not active.
- At the root, you may originate a ping/traceroute on the CP even if it is a 
backup CP. The downstream replication segments installed are independent and 
follow the previous bullet point.

Therefore would the following text be clearer summary of this?:

"Upon reception of a P2MP Ping/Traceroute, every PI installed on every node 
SHOULD process and respond to ping/traceroute even if not the active PI"
HB> I understand the confusion will rework the text. Thanks!

HB> will update the new version with the above changes by Friday.

From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) 
<jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Friday, June 14, 2024 at 1:49 AM
To: Michael McBride 
<michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com<mailto:michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com>>, 
p...@ietf.org<mailto:p...@ietf.org> <p...@ietf.org<mailto:p...@ietf.org>>
Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> 
<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping
Hi,

I went through the document and I think it is ready.
It’s an important draft and has implementations, so I support its publication.

Thanks,
Jorge

From: Michael McBride 
<michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com<mailto:michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com>>
Date: Friday, June 7, 2024 at 7:44 PM
To: p...@ietf.org<mailto:p...@ietf.org> <p...@ietf.org<mailto:p...@ietf.org>>
Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> 
<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [pim] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.


Hello,

Today begins a 2 week wglc for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping/. Please give 
it a review and let us know if you think it’s ready for advancement.

thanks,
mike
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to