Hi PIM, I've reviewed the latest version and support its progression. The document is a fairly straight forward read extending on the existing P2MP architecture documents and leverages the existing p2mp mpls ping capabilities in an SR way in a clean way.
Authors, some minor text comments/suggestions below. Thanks Andrew Section 3 - it says the ping/traceroute can be initiated from the node that initiates the P2MP Policy. Would it more clear to just say "From the root of the P2MP Policy"? Section 3.1 - /packet are/packets are/ Section 3.1 /appropriate respond is send/appropriate response is sent/ Section 3.1 "trace route" and others have "Traceroute" - suggest one or the other Section 3.1 - " On the egress node the corresponding CP and its PI should respond irrespective if it is the active CP or a backup CP." Seems this statement iis intermixing a few terms that can be misinterpreted depending on the perspective due to the CP, backup CP, and PI active terms. The term "egress" was throwing me off a bit as well. My understanding is the purpose of the text is to indicate the following: - Every transit and leaf node along the path which has a path instance, those instances are installed, and SHOULD process and respond to ping/traceroute even if that path instance is not active. - At the root, you may originate a ping/traceroute on the CP even if it is a backup CP. The downstream replication segments installed are independent and follow the previous bullet point. Therefore would the following text be clearer summary of this?: "Upon reception of a P2MP Ping/Traceroute, every PI installed on every node SHOULD process and respond to ping/traceroute even if not the active PI" From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <jorge.rabadan=40nokia....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Friday, June 14, 2024 at 1:49 AM To: Michael McBride <michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com>, p...@ietf.org <p...@ietf.org> Cc: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping Hi, I went through the document and I think it is ready. It’s an important draft and has implementations, so I support its publication. Thanks, Jorge From: Michael McBride <michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com> Date: Friday, June 7, 2024 at 7:44 PM To: p...@ietf.org <p...@ietf.org> Cc: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [pim] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hello, Today begins a 2 week wglc for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping/. Please give it a review and let us know if you think it’s ready for advancement. thanks, mike
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
