Andrew, I will fix the nits in the next revision.
-> should "path" and "paths" be capitalized when in context of "Candidate > path" ?. Related, some text has "candidate path" and others has "Candidate > path". > > > I will make all occurrence consistent as "Candidate Path(s)" > > Section 4.1.1 > > -> Bullet 3. Create candidate path should likely include the same > arguments as update (Preference, Constraints, Optimization, ...) > I will make this change. Thanks, Rishabh. *From: *spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Michael McBride < michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com> > > *Date: *Sunday, April 21, 2024 at 10:37 PM > *To: *p...@ietf.org <p...@ietf.org> > *Cc: *spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy > > Hello good people, > > > > Today begins a two week wglc for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-08. > The related (normative) replication segment draft has now been published as > a standards track RFC. The poll in the Brisbane pim room was 3 in favor and > 0 against. Please respond with your opinions on the advancement of this > draft. > > > > Thanks, > > mike > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > p...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
