While different WGs use issue trackers differently, in SPRING we
consider the email list the primary source of information. We use the
issue tracker to help us track long term issues. We also use it when
the chairs when to be explixcit about how we understand the issue. At
the current time, there is no lack of discussion of these issues on the
list, so we do not need an "issue" record to record it. Also, given the
range of views being expresssed (which is veyr good) we would
practically have to copy the exchanges intot he issue tracker to get it
all, which would not help anyone.
For SPRING, the issue tracker is a tool, just as the open issue section
of the draft was a tool, to help us do our work.
Yours,
Joel
On 3/27/2024 7:12 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Andrew,
In IETF process issues should be opened by those who claim their
existence not by the authors of the document.
And repo shows 5 closed issues:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-spring/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed
Maybe authors could keep latest version of the draft in there, but
this is usually chairs decision how they do version control on active
WG documents.
Cheers,
R.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:02 PM Andrew Alston - IETF
<andrew-i...@liquid.tech> wrote:
Interesting Robert,
That entire repo is entirely empty – was last updated on Feb 11th
– and directly conflicts with the slide deck presented at 119
which expressly lists the checksum issue as an open issue.
As per
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/slides-119-spring-compressed-srv6-segment-list-encoding
Andrew
*
*
Internal All Employees
From: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net>
*Date: *Wednesday, 27 March 2024 at 13:58
*To: *Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org>
*Cc: *Andrew Alston - IETF <andrew-i...@liquid.tech>,
spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org
<spring@ietf.org>
*Subject: *Re: [spring] Chair Review of
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-11
Nick,
So which part of RFC7282 ?
In tracker I see zero open issues:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-spring/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/issues
All issues have been addressed.
So what is the problem ?
Thx,
R.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:43 AM Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org>
wrote:
Robert Raszuk wrote on 27/03/2024 10:13:
> WGLC on this doc started Jan 22nd - Today we have March 27th
- was the
> result of the working group's last call announced and I
missed it ?
> Looking at the list it seems this draft got pretty
overwhelming support
> already. Why are we not progressing ? What is holding us ?
rfc7282.
Consensus is not weight of numbers.
Nick
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
