Interesting Robert, That entire repo is entirely empty – was last updated on Feb 11th – and directly conflicts with the slide deck presented at 119 which expressly lists the checksum issue as an open issue.
As per https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/slides-119-spring-compressed-srv6-segment-list-encoding Andrew Internal All Employees From: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> Date: Wednesday, 27 March 2024 at 13:58 To: Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> Cc: Andrew Alston - IETF <andrew-i...@liquid.tech>, spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] Chair Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-11 Nick, So which part of RFC7282 ? In tracker I see zero open issues: https://github.com/ietf-wg-spring/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/issues All issues have been addressed. So what is the problem ? Thx, R. On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:43 AM Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org<mailto:n...@foobar.org>> wrote: Robert Raszuk wrote on 27/03/2024 10:13: > WGLC on this doc started Jan 22nd - Today we have March 27th - was the > result of the working group's last call announced and I missed it ? > Looking at the list it seems this draft got pretty overwhelming support > already. Why are we not progressing ? What is holding us ? rfc7282. Consensus is not weight of numbers. Nick
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
