I agree with the proposed solution for issue #5 can be closed. Thanks
Gyan On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:01 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > Issue #5 reads: > > The use of C-SIDs might cause some difficulty in troubleshooting error > conditions signaled by ICMPv6. Section 5.4 of [RFC8754] describes the > ICMPv6 error processing that is required to be performed on the SR Source > Nodes to correlate packets since the Destination Address of the packet > changes in flight. > > Similar logic needs to be specified for SR Source Nodes that use C-SIDs to > determine the Destination Address for use by protocol-error handlers. > > The response from the editors reads: > > Added text in revision -03 (Sec. 10.3 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-05#section-10.3>) > generalizing the RFC 8754 behavior for the SIDs defined in > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression. > > - Repeatedly apply the SID behavior until doing so would result in > processing the upper-layer header > - The destination address at the last iteration is the ultimate > destination of the packet > > > Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution > sufficient to close the issue, or have further concerns that should be > addressed. If you have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This > call is open for two weeks, through August 22. > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
