Dear WG, I’d think this issue is resolved by draft-ietf-6man-sids.
Best regards, Martin Von: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> im Auftrag von Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> Datum: Mittwoch, 16. August 2023 um 03:31 An: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org> Betreff: [spring] Confirming resolution of issue #2 of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression As mentioned earlier, we also need to confirm the resolution of issue #2 on the subject document. This call will run for 1 week. Please speak up if you either support closing this issue or see aspects that need further discussion or different resolution. Issue 2 reads: As reminded in the conclusion of the adoption call, this document is subject to the policy announced by the SPRING chairs in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/vCc9Ckvwu5HA-RCleV712dsA5OA/. In particular, this means that this document can not go to WG last call until 6man completes handling of an Internet Draft that deals with the relationship of C-SIDs to RFC 4291. It is hoped and expected that said resolution will be a WG last call and document approval in 6man of a document providing for the way that C-SIDs use the IPv6 destination address field. The document currently being looked at for this is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-krishnan-6man-sids The editors' response reads: draft-ietf-6man-sids addresses this issue and it has been WG Last Called by 6man. Thank you, Joel
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
