As mentioned earlier, we also need to confirm the resolution of issue #2
on the subject document.
This call will run for 1 week. Please speak up if you either support
closing this issue or see aspects that need further discussion or
different resolution.
Issue 2 reads:
As reminded in the conclusion of the adoption call, this document is
subject to the policy announced by the SPRING chairs in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/vCc9Ckvwu5HA-RCleV712dsA5OA/.
In particular, this means that this document can not go to WG last call
until 6man completes handling of an Internet Draft that deals with the
relationship of C-SIDs to RFC 4291. It is hoped and expected that said
resolution will be a WG last call and document approval in 6man of a
document providing for the way that C-SIDs use the IPv6 destination
address field.
The document currently being looked at for this
ishttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-krishnan-6man-sids
The editors' response reads:
draft-ietf-6man-sids addresses this issue and it has been WG Last Called
by 6man.
Thank you,
Joel
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
