Hi authors and WG, I have gone through the thread and find it is still not very clear to me about how to handle MVPN in IPv6 case when using replication segment. Based on my understanding, there are 2 options here:
1. Every multicast service flow uses different replication segments without the requirement of MVPN distinguish, where seems to be a contradiction with claim that replication segment could be reused by different multicast flow 2. Use "additional context" to indicate MVPN which is not clearly defined in the existing document or other SPRING work I think more clarification is requested here. Best Xuesong From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 11:10 PM To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org> Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment Dear WG: This email starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/ Please read the updated document if you haven't already and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than December 12th 2022. If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point. Lastly, if you are an author or contributor please respond to indicate whether you know of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Thanks! Jim, Joel & Bruno
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
