Hi Everyone,
I support for its WG adoption. It uses resource aware SIDs to provide
different SR based Virtual Transport Networks for different service
requirements from customers. In addition, One VTN may be separated from the
others. This is useful.
I have a couple of comments. In Section 2.2, "VTN.s" in the first sentence
should be "VTNs.". In section 3.2, it seems better also to add stateful PCE as
a reference.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of James Guichard
<james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 6:46 AM
To: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn
Dear WG:
This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn%2F&data=04%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C279f0709bae94787fa4f08d8c2b93a2c%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637473448126500112%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0&sdata=L2XVwYEN3hJfTxqqI1ZH%2BhKWdL8nxhHSc3JSLCWjWyU%3D&reserved=0>
ending February 10th 2021.
After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption
to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the document, please
state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level
of people in the working group willing to work on this document. Please also
provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a
stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.
Thanks!
Jim, Bruno & Joel
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
