Hi, > That CRH is simple is a bit like claiming that MPLS is simple just because > the header has few fields. > I think you would be hard pressed to substantiate that any solution here is > particularly simpler than any other. But you are welcome to try.
As a user I usually find: Fewer fields -> fewer moving bits -> simpler to understand and debug > Everyone claims to want a simple solution, funnily enough the end result is > usually the opposite. The words "simple" and "source routing" are oxymorons. > Let's leave the marketing out of this. It is indeed all more complex than simple SRC->DST routing. Cheers, Sander
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
