Hi Zafar, Correct. For instance next free value 6 for SID at IPFIX entity 46.
We have seen vendor implementation marking 5 even though the label value is a SID, not coming from LDP. This due to the fact that there is no value assigned for SID yet. Best Wishes Thomas Graf ____________________________________________________________________________ Network Engineer Datacenter Functions Telefon +41-58-223 84 01 Mobile +41-79-728 80 12 thomas.g...@swisscom.com<mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com> ____________________________________________________________________________ Swisscom (Schweiz) AG IT, Network & Infrastructure Datacenter Functions Binzring 17 8045 Zürich www.swisscom.com Postadresse: Binzring 17 8045 Zürich From: Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2020 3:44 PM To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-DCF <thomas.g...@swisscom.com>; draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-account...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting-04 reviewed Hi Thomas Did you mean there is a need for IPFIX MPLS label type entry for Binding SID? Can you please elaborate? Thanks Regards ... Zafar From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "thomas.g...@swisscom.com<mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com>" <thomas.g...@swisscom.com<mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com>> Date: Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 9:31 AM To: "draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-account...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-account...@ietf.org>" <draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-account...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-account...@ietf.org>> Cc: "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: [spring] draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting-04 reviewed Dear Zafar, Dear draft authors, I reviewed draft-ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting-04 and tested it in Swisscom's lab. Planning to deploy it in the production network in the coming months. The draft is very straight forward and easy to read. I have only one small comment regarding section 7, IANA Considerations. In IPFIX entity type 46 at IANA, the top label type (label source) is defined. In the following section the possible values are described: https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-mpls-label-type<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2Fipfix.xhtml%23ipfix-mpls-label-type&data=02%7C01%7CThomas.Graf%40swisscom.com%7C77d5d2926dba439191fd08d7bdeefdaf%7C364e5b87c1c7420d9beec35d19b557a1%7C1%7C0%7C637186706461423641&sdata=l2ZfUq0PHaTGFQCHwfsaFL7jKT0CGorn9QpBo4OKy1A%3D&reserved=0> For Segment Routing an additional value needs to be defined and your draft seems to be the right place to cover that. Hope that makes sense. Best Wishes Thomas Graf ____________________________________________________________________________ Network Engineer Datacenter Functions Telefon +41-58-223 84 01 Mobile +41-79-728 80 12 thomas.g...@swisscom.com<mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com> ____________________________________________________________________________ Swisscom (Schweiz) AG IT, Network & Infrastructure Datacenter Functions Binzring 17 8045 Zürich www.swisscom.com<http://www.swisscom.com/> Postadresse: Binzring 17 8045 Zürich
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
