On 26/2/20 18:02, john leddy.net wrote:
So you are saying that other than the PSP issue, you support moving the document forward?
A number of us had repeatedly expressed their concerns with the document. Please check the mailing-list archives.
I haven't argued in favor or against the document. I simply asked the existing specifications be complied with.
It's a waste of time to be rehashing the same discussions all the time. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
