> Definitely the proposal. That a vendor seems to have an inappropriate amount > of influence on the IETF process is just an additional concern.
PS: that the vendor is Cisco in this instance is not relevant. Any vendor doing this would be equally bad. Any major vendor has played inappropriate games using the IETF. This is just what is currently on the table.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
