> Therefore – this redefines the address semantics – and that – should be > accompanied by an update to said drafts to avoid confusion and to avoid > potential future complications >
Please observe that we have a lot of IETF documents putting various stuff into IPv6 128 bits. Take rfc7599 as an easy example. Where do you see anyone in IETF requested to update IPv6 base specs when any of such documents were going via standards track ? Cheers, R. >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
