Hi, As mentioned in the draft, the choice of the locator length is deployment specific. LINE has deployed SRv6 using a locator different than a /64.
Cheers, Pablo. [1] https://speakerdeck.com/line_developers/line-data-center-networking-with-srv6 -----Original Message----- From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 09:44 To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Le 19/12/2019 à 00:13, Mark Smith a écrit : [...] > VLSM [variable length subnet mask] is fundamentally hard, We need VLSM in other places too, such as in ULA prefixes fd and fc. I think it is indeed a difficult to grasp concept, but it is there for growth. Alex > > Regards, > Mark. > > __ > > In this case, we should probably change the document to reflect > implemented behavior.____ > > __ __ > > > Ron____ > > __ __ > > > Juniper Business Use Only > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org <mailto:spring@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
