Hi Yakov, Robin,
On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > Robin, > >> Alvaro, >> >> Section 2 of draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case presents as follows: >> >> >> " >> From an SR viewpoint, we would like to highlight the following >> requirement: the adjacency segments used to support the tunnels T1 >> and T2 MUST NOT benefit from local protection. This is achieved by >> resetting the B-flag in the related AdjSID's as per the IGP >> extensions defined in [3]. >> " >> >> >> It is too detailed to define like "This is achieved by resetting >> the B-flag in the related AdjSID's as per the IGP extensions >> defined in [3]". The use case should be defined well instead of >> protocol procedures. >> >> Regards, >> >> Zhenbin(Robin) > > Agreed. sure, I think I mentioned already that we're going to update the draft and remove any reference to a solution... not a single bit ;-) s. > > Yakov. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
