On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Lev Veyde <lve...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> That's not the same. The installer is produced with NSIS, and I see no reason 
> to hide it.
>
> It can be run on Windows, Fedora and a plenty of other OSes, so it's 
> irrelevant.
> I'm also not saying about giving the attribution to all the libraries that we 
> use, the user could find all the info if he's interested.
>
> Showing and make the NSIS brand on the other side is important - first to 
> make more users aware of it's existence and second to show that it's actually 
> being used by serious projects.
> Also, most commercial installers prominently show their copyright/trademark 
> notice in the installer with no option to remove or alter it's appearance, so 
> the very fact that NSIS as an open source product gives you an option to 
> remove the copyright, doesn't mean you should do it unless there is an 
> absolute necessity for this.
>
> Also IMHO, the need of the open source community is more important than some 
> aesthetics considerations.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Lev Veyde.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christophe Fergeau" <cferg...@redhat.com>
> To: "Lev Veyde" <lve...@redhat.com>
> Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 12:10:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [NSIS 3/7] packaging: Re-enable NSIS branding
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:26:29AM -0400, Lev Veyde wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Almost all installers provide this kind of info, and the idea is to show it 
>> so everyone, including ones who don't really know how and where to search 
>> will get a pointer.
>> So I think it's a good idea to tell everyone who runs the installer
>> "it's produced with NSIS", so that anyone who may need to build an
>> installer of it's own could search for it.
>
> I really disagree on that, this will not be useful for many people, and
> then, we should also advertise the installer is built on fedora, that
> it's free software, that it uses macro X and Y, ... so that anyone who
> need to build an installer knows it's possible to do it this way.
> I'm not against saying we use NSIS, but the way it's done is too
> intrusive, so let's hide it ;)

If you only object to the aesthetics, and not the principle, can you please
state what should be done to make it nice enough for you? Searching for
'branding' in [1] does find a few tunables.

[1] http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Docs/Chapter4.html
-- 
Didi
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to