Am Sonntag, den 26.12.2010, 20:52 +0100 schrieb Marc-André Lureau: > Hi > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Tiziano Müller > <tiziano.muel...@stepping-stone.ch> wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > What do you think about having a spice URL (scheme)? > > The idea behind this is that we would like to register a protocol > > handler in the browser (or in the OS) to automatically start the spice > > client based on a certain URL. > > > > examples: > > spice://somehost:port/?password=sekrit&fullscreen=true > > spices://somehost:sport/?password=sekrit&fullscreen=true > > > > spice-gtk (and spicy) is using this scheme: > > spice://host?port=123,tls-port=124 > > It make sense to specify the ports as arguments, rather than in the > address part, since there is several connections which can use either > the normal or the tls port.
Fine by me, but does it really make sense to give the client a choice whether or not he wants to use an encrypted connection if he gets the connection info to use one? -- stepping stone GmbH Neufeldstrasse 9 CH-3012 Bern Telefon: +41 31 332 53 63 www.stepping-stone.ch tiziano.muel...@stepping-stone.ch _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
