Hilmar Lapp <hl...@drycafe.net> writes: > Perhaps it would be better to divide the proposed changes into two > steps. The first would be to _only_ alter the section on bylaws > amendments to establish a more reasonable (i.e., realistically > attainable) quorum.
That's not a bad idea, but honestly, given the outcome of the recent vote, I too believe that just calling for the same vote again with the call for votes making it VERY clear that there are significant quorum issues with the existing bylaws that make it very important that EVERYONE take time to vote, would likely yield the desired outcome in one step. Further, I note that most public corporations when calling for stockholder votes express the desire of the board on each question. Something similar, in which the call for votes explicitly expresses the desire of the board that anyone who is ambivalent about or just feels they don't have time to research the issues please vote in favor of the bylaws change would seem completely appropriate to me here. Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
