Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> [2017-08-14 10:49]: > > Should some of the funds be kept back for future domain renewal > > fees, or are those covered from the ongoing SPI income? > > It's not very obvious but that's why I put the renewal of the domain > before the transfer of the funds, i.e. we'd renew the domain and pay > (if needed [*]) and then transfer the remaining funds.
Surely SPI needs to renew the domain on an ongoing basis -- basically forever -- not just one time. It seems like there ought the be clauses somewhere specifying that SPI should continue to do this, or that MadWifi has the authority to tell SPI to do so. (How? they'd not be an associated project anymore.) What if eventually MadWifi as a project decides to get the domain back for whatever reason? Is it possible for SPI to decide to give it back? I think holding onto the domain is a complicated business. -- Álvaro Herrera _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
