* Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> [2017-08-15 11:43]: > Surely SPI needs to renew the domain on an ongoing basis -- basically > forever -- not just one time.
SPI could just renew it now for 10 years (or 20 or 50 or whatever makes sense) - and let it expire when nobody cares about it anymore (except historians, but there's always archive.org). > It seems like there ought the be clauses somewhere specifying that > SPI should continue to do this, or that MadWifi has the authority to > tell SPI to do so. (How? they'd not be an associated project > anymore.) What if eventually MadWifi as a project decides to get > the domain back for whatever reason? Is it possible for SPI to > decide to give it back? These are very good points. I didn't propose the resolution in the meeting we had yesterday because the question of domain ownership needs to be clarified. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
