On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:50:09PM -0800, Josh berkus wrote: > So in all of this discussion, I've not heard anything which seems > terribly persuasive compared with just taking our existing system and > fixing the problem with unranked candidates
FWIW this is already fixed; the current system supports both the old "unranked means no preference" and the preferred "unranked means lower preference than all ranked" and defaults to the latter. J. -- "A true friend knows who you are...but likes you anyway." This .sig brought to you by the letter C and the number 2 Product of the Republic of HuggieTag _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
