On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:57:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:02:00AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 7/18/16 9:29 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > This is especially true given that our variant of Condorcet is still > > > interpreting a ballot "1. Z 2. X" as not preferring Z or X to Y, > > > which is IMO an extremely serious deficiency in itself. > > I was told off-list that this was changed now: > > https://github.com/u1f35c/spi-members/commit/330e3e0cadbfac6c0ea2421af4e900c6c58bc86d > > This seems like it doesn't actually change the way votes are counted, > though it does do most of the work so that someone can easily make that > change later? Or am I misunderstanding?
You are correct; there is another change required so that the system knows a) which voting system is in use for a given vote and b) how many winners there should be. These changes will also provide the ground work for adding any other voting system that gets decided on. J. -- 101 things you can't have too much of : 17 - Money. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
