Filipus Klutiero writes ("Re: Voting system for elections"): > On 2016-07-18 09:29, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is especially true given that our variant of Condorcet is still > interpreting a ballot "1. Z 2. X" as not preferring Z or X to Y, > which is IMO an extremely serious deficiency in itself. > > > I fail to see how the system could infer any preference about Y from > a ranking which does not mention Y, and I certainly do not see how > this would constitute an extremely serious deficiency.
Every other voting system anywhere on the planet treats a ballot mentioning only X as preferring X to all other candidates. Every other preferential voting system treats a ballot ranking X 1st, and Y 2nd, as a preference for X or Y over all other candidates. That is how voters expect these systems to work. Our voting system treats a ballot mentioning only X as expressing no preference whatsoever. Ian. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general