On 07/18/2016 06:29 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > As has been discussed here many times previously, Condorcet is a bad > system for multi-seat elections. Rather than electing a board whose > composition reflects, proportionately, the views of the electorate, > the majoritarian or consensus candidates (as applicable) will sweep > the board.
Given SPI's history, that sounds like a feature, not a bug. Also, generally SPI elections don't involve much in the way of published views. Not saying that I love concordet, just that this doesn't feel much like an argument for change. --Josh _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
