Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated
Project status"):
> Well again, not so much opposed to the idea of them giving us
> information as much as us actually acting on it.
>
> 15 DDs stood in a room and cried foul.
> What does that mean?
`Cried foul' is the wrong way to put it. What they would say is
something like this:
We the undersigned 12 Debian Developers have sponsored a resolution
to freeze and overturn the DPL's decision to buy a pony.
The resolution itself is here: http://lists.debian.org/....
According to the Debian constitution (http://www.debian.org/...)
section 4.2(2)(2), our opposition has immediately placed the DPL's
decision on hold. (K is Q or 5, whichever is the smaller, so our
12 sponsors are definitely at least 2K.)
So any 10 DDs are enough to put a decision on hold pending a vote.
This has rarely happened in practice.
See http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution, which is the document
that SPI has agreed to honour.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
