Probably really stuck then and not doing much anymore :-(

Sorry to not be of further help but maybe Sam has some ideas still :-)

Cheers,
Sebastian

On 25.10.2012, at 18:11, "Emailitis" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry Sebastian, I didn't notice your response!
> 
> I just ran
> Strace -f -p 18211
> But I get the same results as before...am I doing it right?
> 
> Koha Choji
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Emailitis
> Sent: 25 October 2012 17:01
> To: 'spamdyke users'
> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke CPU usage
> 
> The only spamdyke process to appear when I run top is that particular
> process. No other process seems to be using that much CPU power.
> 
> Log messages... something like this?
> [root@our_plesk_server ~]# cat /var/log/messages | grep spamdyke Oct 25
> 11:10:51 our_plesk_server kernel: grsec: From XX.XX.XX.XX: process
> /usr/local/bin/spamdyke(spamdyke:18211) attached to via ptrace by
> /usr/bin/strace[strace:31611] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0, parent
> /bin/bash[bash:25024] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0 Oct 25 13:03:16
> our_plesk_server kernel: grsec: From XX.XX.XX.XX: process
> /usr/local/bin/spamdyke(spamdyke:18211) attached to via ptrace by
> /usr/bin/strace[strace:15386] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0, parent
> /bin/bash[bash:25024] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0
> 
> This log starts from Oct 21 06:52:10.
> 
> I'm a bit unsure about killing it but so far we haven't had any trouble with
> running things on our server. Could this be a false reading?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Koha Choji
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Clippinger
> Sent: 25 October 2012 16:46
> To: spamdyke users
> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke CPU usage
> 
> Also, stopping qmail won't stop any running spamdyke or qmail-smtpd
> processes, it'll only stop new ones from being created.
> 
> Are you seeing high CPU usage from all spamdyke processes or just a single
> one?  Are you seeing any log messages from this/these high CPU process/es?
> It'd be great to see what it's doing with strace but I'm also curious if
> another spamdyke process will use high CPU if the existing one is killed.
> 
> -- Sam Clippinger
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote:
> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>> Try strace -f to follow any child's created? Maybe there is more to see.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Sebastian
>> 
>> On 25.10.2012, at 15:54, "J. Kendzorra" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 25.10.2012 14:06, schrieb Emailitis:
>>>> Thanks, J for the response!
>>>> 
>>>> Runing strace doesn't seem to give me much, I hit ctrl+c after a 
>>>> minute or so.
>>>> 
>>>> [root@our_plesk_server ~]# strace 18211
>>>> Strace: 18211 attached - interrupt to quit Process 18211 detached 
>>>> [root@our_plesk_server ~]#
>>> 
>>> Doesn't appear to be Spamdyke then ... you sure about that?
>>> 
>>> J.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to