At least to me with spf, spamdyke, simscan and clamav is enough to stop the spam, I use spamassassin and dspam cpu time consuming especially when I have to run up to 5000 email accounts.
Regards. Pablo González A. On 11 November 2010 19:44, nightduke <[email protected]> wrote: > I like Qmailtoaster it's easy and people keeps updating but qmailrocks > still a little bit old. > > But my question is ab should i use for scanning attachments, simscan? > or what else? > > About spamdyke it's wonderfull but a good gui will give us more > information about what's going on with spam, whitelist and blacklist, > stats it's important. > > That's why i need to work with mailscanner or dspam, does anyone have > used spamdyke with any of this software? > > Thanks a lot for your comments and pardon me for my poor english. > > > > 2010/10/31 Eric Shubert <[email protected]>: >> On 10/31/2010 08:44 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: >>> nightduke wrote: >>>> I'm tired of spam, i want to use spamdyke with dspam or mailscanner. >>>> I don't want to receive virus, i want to block spam with spamdyke but >>>> also i want to have more features like dspam or mailscanner have, >>>> after the mail server is a lotus domino server. >>>> What's your opinion about my idea? >>> >>> Most anti-spam solutions involve several levels. No one tool will give you >>> everything you need. >>> >>> For instance, I use Spamdyke, SpamAssassin, ClamAV and some custom >>> scanning tools. >>> >>> If you're looking at Spamdyke, presumably you're running qmail as your >>> mail transport agent (because Spamdyke is a plugin for qmail). There are >>> several guides that will tell you how to integrate anti-spam and >>> anti-virus tools with qmail. I've found that one of the simplest is >>> Qmailrocks (http://qmailrocks.org/). Not everyone likes Qmailrocks: >>> purists will tell you that not all the advice given is good and the guide >>> hasn't been updated in a while. On the other hand, it is easy to follow >>> and, in my experience at least, gives good results. I can also confirm >>> that adding Spamdyke to a Qmailrocks installation is easy (thanks to Sam's >>> clearly-written instructions). >>> >>> An alternative is Qmailtoaster (http://www.qmailtoaster.com/). >>> >>> Angus >> >> Good advice, Angus. >> >> Hey nightduke, I thought you had a qmailtoaster going. That's really the >> simplest route to go IMO, and I doubt that (along with spamdyke) you'll >> find anything more effective when it comes to fighting spam. I expect >> that version 2 of QMT will be even better, as it will be yum/rpm based >> for all package management, instead of having to build qmail (et al) >> from source, and spamdyke will be included in the 'stock' configuration. >> >> Installing spamdyke on QMT is as simple as running the >> qtp-install-spamdyke script. >> >> I don't think you'll find dspam or mailscanner to be significantly more >> effective than spamassassin, in conjunction with spamdyke. If I had to >> choose only one piece of software for fighting spam, it'd be spamdyke >> hands down. >> >> FWIW. >> >> -- >> -Eric 'shubes' >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spamdyke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >> > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
