I like Qmailtoaster it's easy and people keeps updating but qmailrocks still a little bit old.
But my question is ab should i use for scanning attachments, simscan? or what else? About spamdyke it's wonderfull but a good gui will give us more information about what's going on with spam, whitelist and blacklist, stats it's important. That's why i need to work with mailscanner or dspam, does anyone have used spamdyke with any of this software? Thanks a lot for your comments and pardon me for my poor english. 2010/10/31 Eric Shubert <[email protected]>: > On 10/31/2010 08:44 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: >> nightduke wrote: >>> I'm tired of spam, i want to use spamdyke with dspam or mailscanner. >>> I don't want to receive virus, i want to block spam with spamdyke but >>> also i want to have more features like dspam or mailscanner have, >>> after the mail server is a lotus domino server. >>> What's your opinion about my idea? >> >> Most anti-spam solutions involve several levels. No one tool will give you >> everything you need. >> >> For instance, I use Spamdyke, SpamAssassin, ClamAV and some custom >> scanning tools. >> >> If you're looking at Spamdyke, presumably you're running qmail as your >> mail transport agent (because Spamdyke is a plugin for qmail). There are >> several guides that will tell you how to integrate anti-spam and >> anti-virus tools with qmail. I've found that one of the simplest is >> Qmailrocks (http://qmailrocks.org/). Not everyone likes Qmailrocks: >> purists will tell you that not all the advice given is good and the guide >> hasn't been updated in a while. On the other hand, it is easy to follow >> and, in my experience at least, gives good results. I can also confirm >> that adding Spamdyke to a Qmailrocks installation is easy (thanks to Sam's >> clearly-written instructions). >> >> An alternative is Qmailtoaster (http://www.qmailtoaster.com/). >> >> Angus > > Good advice, Angus. > > Hey nightduke, I thought you had a qmailtoaster going. That's really the > simplest route to go IMO, and I doubt that (along with spamdyke) you'll > find anything more effective when it comes to fighting spam. I expect > that version 2 of QMT will be even better, as it will be yum/rpm based > for all package management, instead of having to build qmail (et al) > from source, and spamdyke will be included in the 'stock' configuration. > > Installing spamdyke on QMT is as simple as running the > qtp-install-spamdyke script. > > I don't think you'll find dspam or mailscanner to be significantly more > effective than spamassassin, in conjunction with spamdyke. If I had to > choose only one piece of software for fighting spam, it'd be spamdyke > hands down. > > FWIW. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
