-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 12:44 am, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:01:24PM +1100, David Hooton wrote:
> > I've been playing with bayes on my home machine and have been very
> > impressed with it. I was however wondering to what degree everyone else
> > trusts BAYES_99? Is it generally accepted as a sure spamsign or do you
> > expect ti to be backed up by other scores I order to rank it as definite
> > spam?
> >
> > I realise this will have a lot to do with training etc, however I've
> > found it to be generally a very strong spamsign, and I was wanting to
> > know other peoples experiences.
>
> I use a threshold of 8 and BAYES_99 scores a 6.
you would be appalled at my scores then threshold of 14 and bayes_99 of 20 or
so. Just in case there are any negatives that might kick in.
>
> Regards
> Johann
- --
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Brook Humphrey
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holiness unto the Lord
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAFvUhnT1TkA6FgPgRAjDqAJ9W+d1awgG3+rbt7KgVBxsBnia3qgCfVCBI
bvyaJRb35kwi86nzIeLgvE4=
=VN3h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
