On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:01:24 +1100 "David Hooton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All, > > I've been playing with bayes on my home machine and have been very impressed > with it. I was however wondering to what degree everyone else trusts > BAYES_99? Is it generally accepted as a sure spamsign or do you expect ti > to be backed up by other scores I order to rank it as definite spam? > > I realise this will have a lot to do with training etc, however I've found > it to be generally a very strong spamsign, and I was wanting to know other > peoples experiences. > I trust BAYES_90 and BAYES_99 completely and send all mail with this marker to a spamtrap. I do review the subject headers in the spamtrap and have not had a FP since I started a few months ago. Alex ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
