So I guess the question is, how 'expensive' would it be in terms of processing power
There's also the question of how much benefit would it have.
I recall someone trying out searching for close matches to spam words in a corpus and not getting very good results at picking up spam without false positives.
On the other hand, Bayes seems to pick up most of these spams for me with no problem. Razor, DCC, and RBL checks seem to take care of the rest and help to train Bayes to be better at catching them.
Does anyone who is concerned about the obfuscation have any statistics to show that it really is a problem for the current rules plus network tests plus a well-trained Bayes?
-- sidney
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
