-----Original Message----- I've seen that happen on SA servers/mailserver running SA, that are "under-powered" (for lack of a better term), or over-processed. Either processor or memory utization is being drained by either the SA processes or the MTA, or a combination of the two (or other services running on the same box), causing SA to not scan/score/stamp depending on the load of incoming messages at any given time. </2cents> -JR ----- Original Message ----- From: Jae Chang
Hi, I am noticing a disturbing trend within the past month. I'm noticing mails coming thru without any of the normal Spam headers, such as: X-Spam-Checker-Version: X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: These mails inevitably are *never* caught as spam. I can't even check what score they were given, since none of the usual headers are there. From looking at the message delivery paths, I can see the mail *should* have been processed by SA, as it's passed onto exim with -P spam-scanned - this is the standard Debian setup with a SA transport using spamc and spamd. My best guess, is maybe 5-10% are missing headers?! rough guess. Has anyone seen similar behavior? I hope someone can provide insight as to what may be wrong? Thanks! Jay --------------------- Hello, I would get emails scored with (?/?) that would pass through. I just configured my system with qmail-scanner to block misaddressed emails at the SMTP conversation level and the problem went away. -Russell ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
