Hello Dallas,
Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 6:22:05 AM, you wrote:
>> As for Dallas's run against his corpus showing very few hits, I did
>> mention this is the first time I've ever seen this "trick" used and is
>> presumably fairly new. So those rules *might* have some value in the
>> future.
DLE> i keep it in my corpus runs for the next couple weeks to see if
DLE> there is any increases...
Me too. I'll track the CANSPAM rules like any of the new rules. I'll be
running masscheck on them each week as I update my corpus, and will
adjust the scores appropriately.
Today they hit 10 spam, 0 ham. Score 1.10 out of 9.0. It's a significant
score, but not major. ("Major" or "likely" spam rules are often scored
around 3.0 of 9, and "almost certain" spam rules get 6.0 of 9. 1.10 is a
fairly common score for common english phrases used by spammers within my
ruleset.)
Bob Menschel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk