> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Godette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New HTML spam body obfuscation. > > > On Tuesday 13 January 2004 03:23 pm, Rose, Bobby wrote: > > Why even allow javascript embedded emails? > > > > One could say the same about HTML emails. > > Think about the target MUA of spam; Outlook Express. This > type of spam would > only work on O/OE or any MUA that used a JS capable HTML > renderer to display > HTML email without sanatizing it first. > > As for Dallas's run against his corpus showing very few hits, > I did mention > this is the first time I've ever seen this "trick" used and > is presumably > fairly new. So those rules *might* have some value in the future. > >
i keep it in my corpus runs for the next couple weeks to see if there is any increases... thanks. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
