> -----Original Message----- > From: Rolf Kraeuchi > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:05 AM > > Got my first false positive :-/ > Backhair scored on a .pdf... > Any hints how to avoid these? > > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.0 tagged_above=3.0 required=5.3 > tests=J_BACKHAIR_11, J_BACKHAIR_12, J_BACKHAIR_13, J_BACKHAIR_14, > J_BACKHAIR_21, J_BACKHAIR_22, J_BACKHAIR_31, J_BACKHAIR_32, > J_BACKHAIR_36, > J_BACKHAIR_41, J_BACKHAIR_44, J_BACKHAIR_51, UPPERCASE_50_75 > > [...]
I'd asked this before (with no answer on the 'dev' list), but what are SA's policies for scanning attachments? Why would it try to scan a file attachment anyway? I thought it was only supposed to scan text/html attachments? One of the users report an FP on a uuencoded file, but this was sent in the old-style non MIME-compliant fashion. I suggested in that case that he put togther a few rules for noting the BEGIN, END, and long text lines typical of base64, and then build a metarule, scored with a negative score which combined those features of the old-style uuencoded file "attachment". ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
