Thus spake Mitch (WebCob) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [12/01/04 16:39]: > 'Cause they are scammers... they are being actively sued by a variety of > people... > > There are a variety of these buggers, many have bad reps with various > business bureaus, etc. > > From my viewpoint, a con artist with a % of legitimate business, is still a > con artist. > > Just as a legitimate bulk mailer who spams (and gets in an RBL and is > rejected for being a spammer), so should a scam/spammer who MIGHT have some > legitimate business... > > IMHO anyways ;-)
Well, given the few responses, and some discussion with a co-worker, I retract my statement about blacklisting them being a bad thing. If they /are/ being sued, if they /do/ have a bad reputation, then by all means, give them a score. We had not yet tracked down the reason for the bad transfer requests, and I was under the impression that the rate was much lower than it was. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
