Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am running 2.61 but still I seem to be losing this war, especially against the chinese spammers. I have a user whose mail I am passing via SA (I do selective filtering via procmail) on my MTA. While I use so much of those rulesets contributed out there, so much spam still seem to pass through. In fact sometimes I see "tests=none" and I am left wondering what happened at that time that no tests were run? Anyway, for a typical case, one user I have received hundreds of spam from the very kind chinese fellows. SpamAssassin just can't seem to figure out most of these spam (maybe the spammers are so advanced), or they end up scoring very low. My sitewide threshold is 3.9, but still spam comes in. I will highly appreciate all advise towards making this setup better. Unfortunately, I cannot use bayes because of the filtering that I do via procmail as procmail requires DROPPRIVS. I have some mail that was received by this particular user. I have put the tarbal here: http://ns2.wananchi.com/~wash/SPAM/ and it is in Maildir/ format. Looking forward to your observations/suggestions/recommendations. cheers - wash +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------+ Odhiambo Washington . WANANCHI ONLINE LTD (Nairobi, KE) | <wash at wananchi dot com> . 1ere Etage, Loita Hse, Loita St., | GSM: (+254) 722 743 223 . # 10286, 00100 NAIROBI | GSM: (+254) 733 744 121 . (+254) 020 313 985 - 9 | +---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+ "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!" --from a /. post ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
