-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Mitch (WebCob)" writes:
>Sorry for the duplicate if this did make it through the first time - I
>didn't see my echo, or any feedback, so I thought I'd send again.
>
>I'm playing with a way to skip spamc altogether for local users (the third
>case below) - not sure if that is the best way though as it certainly
>involves a little more work than the default install (a more careful check
>of Received headers BEFORE calling spamc) - but will try it anyways...
>(thanks to Gordon Messmer) - at any rate, this other case seems to be a bug
>in SA, so here it is again - will post the correct rule set to bypass if I
>get it figured out.
>
>Thanks.
>
>m/
>
>With the help of Shane Williams (who received a message and showed me how it
>passed his SA ok) I figured out the following:
>
>Courier formats it's received lines like this (this trips
>RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK):
>
>Received: from bigass1.XXX.com ([66.199.X.X])
>  by slim1.XXX.com with esmtp; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:56:09 +0000
>Received: from a1200 ([24.83.X.X])
>  (AUTH: LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>  by bigass1.XXX.com with esmtp; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:56:09 +0000
>
>Shane I presume (by version numbers) is running sendmail - which has a
>different Received format and DOESN'T trip RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK:
>
>Received: from bigass1.XXX.com (ns1.XXX.com [66.199.X.X])
>       by fiat.XXX.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
>    i06MBJ6U020255
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:11:19 -0600
>Received: from a1200 ([24.83.X.X])
>  (AUTH: LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>  by bigass1.XXX.com with esmtp; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:09:53 +0000
>
>So for starters, the "-notfirsthop" option seems to be missing my first
>header.
>
>And for seconds... I will still have a problem when my first header is
>AUTHENTICATED.
>If I send mail to myself, my ONLY received header looks like:
>
>Received: from a1200 ([24.83.X.X])
>  (AUTH: LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>  by bigass1.XXX.com with esmtp; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:56:09 +0000
>
>Which I think should be ignored - although headers can be forged, the first
>header can't - right? And if it says authenticated, I shouldn't be penalized
>for sending mail to myself - right?
>
>So now what - do I file a bug report ? or have I already put the info in the
>right place?

Sounds like it needs a bug report, the Received-header parser isn't
parsing that.

- --j.

>Thanks a bunch for the tool - glad to do my bit - I imagine that this
>problem affects all courier users. Unless I'm missing something?
>
>Thanks!
>
>m/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 4:55 AM
>To: 'Mitch (WebCob)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61 when
>sending myself a test message?
>
>
>Hi, Mitch.
>Could you please provide more information regarding the mail server which is
>running SpamAssassin?  Information such as which MTA it's using, how you're
>calling SpamAssassin (procmail, milter, etc.), and whether the machine is on
>a private NATed address will be helpful in troubleshooting your problem.
>
>
>Thanks.
>Brian
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
>Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
>advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
>Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
>_______________________________________________
>Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQE//HPUQTcbUG5Y7woRAuIfAKCa8u5vHQJXuochp9l4jKKb9atd0wCeNsGq
5iqjx0+JQtUDdTdeM9nMNkc=
=GxaA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to