At Tue Dec 30 23:24:01 2003, pjh wrote: > > Is it true then, that if I do not use sa-learn, that > no Bayesian filtering occurs?
You won't get bayesian filtering until the bayes database has learned 200 spam and 200 ham messages. Ideally, the user teaches bayes ham and spam using sa-learn to feed it; however, SA will auto-learn messages if their score is sufficiently high (for spam) or sufficiently low (for ham). To avoid auto-learning incorrectly, there is a significant margin above and below 5.0 within which it won't auto-learn messages (so, for example, it won't auto-learn a spam that scores 4.9 as ham). You can disable auto-learning via the config files, and you can disable bayes too. But both are enabled by default. If you're not seeing BAYES_xx entries yet, it's possible you haven't learned enough ham or spam, or alternatively that you haven't got appropriate database support available on your system (you need the Perl DB_File module). Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk