This was covered only yesterday... please search before you post!

Rubin

On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 03:47, Ian Duncalf wrote:
> I am testing spamassassin on a test server at the moment but I am looking at
> deploying it onto a machine with 128 meg of ram in the future.
> The new rules have cut down the amount of spam overnight considerably.
> At the moment it is only serving 3 e-mail accounts and traffic is not too
> bad.
> The end game is to set it up for the whole company which is only 15 e-mail
> accounts max.
> 
> A couple things that spring to mind when I eventually do this
>   1. Can I move the bayes database to the new machine ?
>   2  Can I use only one bayes database for sitewide use ?
>   3. I use a .procmailrc per user, I have tried using just 1 as suggested in
> the manual for sitewide use ( yes I have read it ) but had problems, I think
> I need to try it again. I was getting a message in the procmail log file of
> "procmail: Skipped "/var/mail/junk" and then it eventually delivered it to
> my account. I think I tracked this down to a permissions problem, could this
> be so ?
> 
> Ian
> "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > At Mon Dec 22 14:15:45 2003, Ian Duncalf wrote:
> > >
> > > Forgive me if I what I am asking is obvious to some but I would like to
> know
> > > how to use some of the rule sets that available e.g. bigevil.cf and
> > > http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/90_FVGT.cf etc.
> > >
> > > I am running SpamAssassin v2.61 on SuSe 7.3.
> > > I am using Sendmail & the Procmail filter to send through SpamAssassin.
> > > I have tried Spamd but I am only using pentium 200mhz with 48meg ram and
> it
> > > was generating too many children even when I tried to limit it using
> thing
> > > the max_child options.
> >
> > To be honest, on a system of that specification, you really want to
> > stick to one (or possibly two) concurrent copies of SA.  Anything more
> > than that and you risk getting bogged down with swapping.  I use a 486
> > with 32MB RAM, and that just about copes with scanning one message at
> > a time.
> >
> > Including more rules will increase the memory use of SA, and increase
> > the time taken to handle each message.  Depending on your message
> > volume, you may find that your system just isn't up to adding the
> > additional rule sets.
> >
> > If you have the option of adding more memory, I'd recommend that you
> > seriously consider it.  Even moving to 128MB will make a signicant
> > difference.
> >
> > Martin
> > -- 
> > Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
> > Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
> > - see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> > Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
-- 
Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RB Technologies

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to