> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > At 12:07 PM 12/19/2003, Gilson, Larry wrote: > >I am confused. Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf states the following: > > > > "This operates additively, so a trusted_networks line > > after another one will result in all those networks > > becoming trusted." > > Whoops, my bad. > > Perhaps *I* should RTFM... Or at least not post before coffee. > > > Still, it seems strange he has over-lapping declarations...
I was wondering about that too, the over-lapping part. ;) Stupid me, I forgot to cc the list - I suggested the following this morning: > Wild guess here but try the following instead: > > trusted_networks 10/8 > trusted_networks 196.123.129.16 > trusted_networks 127/8 > > 10/8 (subnet mask 255.0.0.0) matches 10.*.*.* > 127/8 matches 127.*.*.* I was wondering if 10.1/16 was stepping on 10/8 as well as 127.0.0.1 on 127/8. --Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
